Pao wields great evidence after the French press claims they have to confiscate Messi’s goal back

Browse By

Simon Marchiniak, World Cup final referee The French media claimed that Lionel Messi’s third goal for Argentina had to be forfeited.

 World Cup final referee Simon Marchiniac has had some words to say after claiming that Argentina ‘s third goal against France should not have been made is the doo.r The 41-year-old Polish black-shirt faced claims from French media that he should have conceded the UFABET goal because two substitutes ran onto the pitch before Lionel Messi. will shoot the ball over the line

Pao wields great evidence after the French press claims they have to confiscate Messi's goal back

          More than 200,000 French football fans have signed a petition for the final to be resumed due to the birth. But Marcheniak has recently responded to the criticism directed at him. During a news conference, according to Zack Lowe. He picked up his phone with a picture he said was the moment. Kylian Mbappe scored one of his three goals against Argentina.

          After taking the lead with two goals before the end of the first half from Messi and Angel Di Maria  Argentina were equalized. When Mbappe scored two goals two minutes into the interval. Extra time And then the moment that became problematic came in the 108th minute. When Lautaro Martinez’s shot was saved by Hugo Lloris. But Messi was in the right place, followed up with a rebound. that bounces out of range

          French media L’Equipe believes that Marciniak and his referees should have forfeited the goal. They wrote under the headline: ‘Why shouldn’t Argentina’s third goal have been scored,’ they were quoted as saying. There were two subs on the pitch before Messi’s shot over the line was ‘absolutely forbidden with the goal being reviewed by VAR for offside. But as the replays showed, Martinez wasn’t offended and led to frenzied celebrations among the players and fans. Regardless of whether VAR looked at the subs coming on or not. L’Equipe feels France should have taken the free-kick based on the actual rules.

They cited Rule 3.9 of football stating: “After scoring a goal The referee knew before he blew the kickoff that started playing. Someone else came on or entered the field during the shot. The referee must reclaim that goal. Or if the person who came down was a player, substitute, player who was fired or the coaching staff of the team that scored the goal, the referee must recommence play by awarding a direct free-kick to the opposing team in a position where another person has entered the field.” 

          But recently, Marcinia used evidence to fight back, claiming that The French substitute was on the field when Mbappe scored. That means his goal should not have been either, with seven bench players on the pitch. The 24-year-old scored the third goal in extra time before Argentina Will win the third World Cup with a penalty shootout “France didn’t mention this photo. which you will see that There were seven French people on the pitch when Mbappe scored  Marciniac said.